×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.

Fascinating New Take on Intelligence

More
12 years 5 months ago - 12 years 5 months ago #11163 by Chris Marti
This appears to be breakthrough type stuff, not directly related to mediation but very interesting none-the-less:

www.insidescience.org/content/physicist-...out-intelligence/987

Intelligence is being explained and modeled as a way to preserve as many future states as possible. It's usually defined in a very different manner, more as a backward looking "how do we explain this or put this puzzle together" kind of way.
Last edit: 12 years 5 months ago by Chris Marti.
More
12 years 5 months ago #11164 by Kate Gowen
I'd say the direct bearing is that meditative skill is a BIG option-opener-- and, thus, a kind of "intelligence" just like walking upright and tool use. No?

Or am I firing off half-cocked? Only skimmed the article.
More
12 years 5 months ago #11171 by Shargrol
Interesting that it's saying that intelligence is samsara-like (self-perpetuating, future propagating, maintaining, surviving through holding possible future contexts...) which makes A LOT of sense to me.
More
12 years 5 months ago #11172 by Shargrol
(I've had this thought that some day humans are going to need to teach machines to awaken. And it will be nearly impossible because of the samsaric nature of computation.)
More
12 years 5 months ago #11173 by Shargrol
(too close to powering off.)
More
12 years 5 months ago #11174 by Ona Kiser
--> write it! that sounds like a very intriguing sci-fi novel!
More
12 years 5 months ago #11177 by Chris Marti
So a machine might suffer if it can't keep it's options open. Hmmm.....
More
12 years 5 months ago #11179 by Shargrol
Right, if it has enough self awareness to become existential, if it realizes there are unrealized options for it's life, it will likely suffer. And then look out! :)
More
12 years 5 months ago #11181 by Tom Otvos

Some cosmologists have suggested that certain fundamental constants in nature have the values they do because otherwise humans would not be able to observe the universe.


I know this isn't why you posted this, but that statement jumped out at me. It was always amazing to me that math "just works" as a language to describe the physical world. So maybe it just works because we are in the only universe (out of an infinite number of universes) where we can see it working.

-- tomo
More
12 years 5 months ago #11183 by Chris Marti
I suspect that reasoning (the math just happens to work out so that we can see the universe) to be tautological. It's a little like saying, "If my parents hadn't met I wouldn't be here." Of course that's true. Both are true, but we can say that kind of thing only in retrospect. Another way to look at this is that the math and physics we use to describe the universe is also driven by the nature of this universe, so OF COURSE it just works out. There is no math we could ever use that is outside this universe that we inhabit because this is where we are and we have, using the observations we make, figured out that math which describes this universe :P
More
12 years 5 months ago #11184 by Ona Kiser
stoner talk!! :evil: :woohoo:
More
12 years 5 months ago #11185 by Chris Marti
So YOU say :lol:
More
12 years 5 months ago #11192 by Eran
That's pretty cool! I'll forward it to David Chapman and see what he has to say.
More
12 years 5 months ago #11195 by Chris Marti
Maybe you can ask David Chapman to post his comments here!
More
12 years 5 months ago #11196 by Eran
Done.
More
12 years 5 months ago #11200 by Eran
Here's a summary of what David had to say:


Quoting David: "Basically, I think it’s completely nonsense... I’ve skimmed their journal article ( www.alexwg.org/publications/PhysRevLett_110-168702.pdf ). As far as I can tell, no merit whatsoever, although it’s possible I missed smtg. You need to understand thermodynamics, information theory, and control theory to see what they are doing.

Something that is almost equivalent is to attach repulsive magnets to everything. Imagine a stick figure with repulsion on each of its hands and feet. Then it will jump up, and if you push on it, it will sort of dance. This is not intelligent. For one thing, you don’t always want to be standing up, and their thing will always make the stick figure stand. The physics is trivial and the philosophical over-interpretation of it is breath taking.

Oh, yes, also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_cow "
More
12 years 5 months ago #11201 by Shargrol
Love it! We've been schooled.
More
12 years 5 months ago - 12 years 5 months ago #11203 by Chris Marti
Doesn't take the fun out of speculating :lol:

Funny, too - the author doesn't seem like a slouch: www.alexwg.org -- MIT, Harvard, etc. Doesn't mean he's right, but it could mean he deserves more than a casual dismissal.

"Dr. Alexander D. Wissner-Gross is an award-winning scientist, inventor, and entrepreneur. He serves as an Institute Fellow at the Harvard University Institute for Applied Computational Science and as a Research Affiliate at the MIT Media Laboratory. He has received 108 major distinctions, authored 15 publications, been granted 19 issued, pending, and provisional patents, and founded, managed, and advised 5 technology companies, 1 of which has been acquired. In 1998 and 1999, respectively, he won the U.S.A. Computer Olympiad and the Intel Science Talent Search. In 2003, he became the last person in MIT history to receive a triple major, with bachelors in Physics, Electrical Science and Engineering, and Mathematics, while graduating first in his class from the MIT School of Engineering. In 2007, he completed his Ph.D. in Physics at Harvard, where his research on smart matter, pervasive computing, and machine learning was awarded the Hertz Doctoral Thesis Prize."

Just my humble, ill informed opinion :P
Last edit: 12 years 5 months ago by Chris Marti.
More
12 years 5 months ago #11213 by Eran
Eventually, it's all about what works. If he can create some sort of general AI that works, then great! If he can create a even a better assembly-line robot, that's pretty awesome. Until then, it's all speculation. And speculation is good geeky fun :)
More
12 years 5 months ago - 12 years 5 months ago #11214 by Chris Marti
And there's just so much really effective artificial general intelligence out there to compete with, right?

:P
Last edit: 12 years 5 months ago by Chris Marti.
More
12 years 5 months ago #11215 by Eran
Not much competition at the moment but there's always Google with their Star Trek obsession... www.slate.com/articles/technology/techno...computer.single.html
Powered by Kunena Forum