- Forum
- Sanghas
- Dharma Forum Refugees Camp
- Dharma Refugees Forum Topics
- Reading, Listening and Viewing Recommendations
- Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
- Kate Gowen
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 2340
12 years 3 months ago #13074
by Kate Gowen
Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn" was created by Kate Gowen
" Some people call these experiences kensho, which means seeing into one’s true nature. I once spoke to a Zen teacher who told me that she had only had one kensho experience but that it was enough. She didn’t say this in a way that sounded like bragging, like she’d had the ultimate kensho and didn’t need any more. She said it like you might say, “I ate fried worms once and once was enough.” It was almost — but not quite — like she was glad it was over and she didn’t want to have to go through it again. I can relate."
www.realitysandwich.com/meeting_god_enlightenment_porn
Somebody's got to ask the rude questions; good for him! And yes, the commenters pointing out that he's having it both ways-- are also right.
www.realitysandwich.com/meeting_god_enlightenment_porn
Somebody's got to ask the rude questions; good for him! And yes, the commenters pointing out that he's having it both ways-- are also right.
12 years 3 months ago #13076
by Ona Kiser
Replied by Ona Kiser on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
I always remember finding him very annoying, but I found that piece rather thoughtful and funny.
- Kate Gowen
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 2340
12 years 3 months ago #13077
by Kate Gowen
Replied by Kate Gowen on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
Yeah, sometimes he's seemed a bit "too clever by half"-- but we're all getting smoothed down in the old practice rock-tumbler, eh?
12 years 3 months ago #13078
by Ona Kiser
It's so cute!
Soon we'll all be patient old codgers being mysterious and annoying to the young bucks with their grand ideas...
As a contributor to the enlightenment porn genre, I must say I think it serves a useful purpose, much like inspirational conversion stories do for Christians. That said, the clever name also points to the slightly "ew" factor, which is apt.
Replied by Ona Kiser on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
Kate Gowen wrote: Yeah, sometimes he's seemed a bit "too clever by half"-- but we're all getting smoothed down in the old practice rock-tumbler, eh?
It's so cute!

As a contributor to the enlightenment porn genre, I must say I think it serves a useful purpose, much like inspirational conversion stories do for Christians. That said, the clever name also points to the slightly "ew" factor, which is apt.
- Kate Gowen
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 2340
12 years 3 months ago #13080
by Kate Gowen
Replied by Kate Gowen on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
"It's so cute! Soon we'll all be patient old codgers being mysterious and annoying to the young bucks with their grand ideas..." 
-- and one of the most annoying things about us will be how our being annoying ( in spite of a patient intention to be useful) is so damned funny-- to us. And how sweet we think the young bucks with their grand ideas are.

-- and one of the most annoying things about us will be how our being annoying ( in spite of a patient intention to be useful) is so damned funny-- to us. And how sweet we think the young bucks with their grand ideas are.
Less
More
- Posts: 718
12 years 3 months ago #13082
by Jake St. Onge
Replied by Jake St. Onge on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
Haha... this morning I had one of those existential moments right upon waking, drifting in and out of sleep, vaguely aware of the impending monday and getting Ivy ready for daycare and then getting into work for staff meeting etc. thinking "oh my god, do you realize, Jake, that *you* are the adult in your life? You are the one who is in charge of all this adult business? There is no one else who will do this shit for you!!!" which reflection wrenched an agonized/amused internal wail of despair/humor from my sleepy prone form... and now to hear you all waxing elder, it's very relieving!
Just to share the flip side of this dynamic
Just to share the flip side of this dynamic

12 years 3 months ago #13083
by Ona Kiser
Replied by Ona Kiser on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
I don't think I get any "elderhood" points yet. By the time I'm any kind of elder I'm likely to be ashes and dust, anyway.
- Kate Gowen
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 2340
12 years 3 months ago #13085
by Kate Gowen
Replied by Kate Gowen on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
Oh, no, you don't-- not so easily off the hook for you, Ms. O!

12 years 3 months ago - 12 years 3 months ago #13086
by Shargrol
Replied by Shargrol on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
Funny, I never feel shame after enlightenment porn...
Kate, what did you mean/are you referring to in the quote above?
Kate Gowen wrote: Somebody's got to ask the rude questions; good for him!
Kate, what did you mean/are you referring to in the quote above?
Last edit: 12 years 3 months ago by Shargrol.
- Kate Gowen
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 2340
12 years 3 months ago #13087
by Kate Gowen
Replied by Kate Gowen on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
The blog post/book excerpt revisited the anecdote of his enlightenment experience in Hardcore Zen. Over the years, he's come to regret writing about it, it seems, and to question the effect it has had on readers, as well as why he'd included it in the book.
I agree with the proposition that these things are fraught with ambiguity, and that neither unqualified enthusiasm nor unqualified rejection is really all that helpful.
I agree with the proposition that these things are fraught with ambiguity, and that neither unqualified enthusiasm nor unqualified rejection is really all that helpful.
12 years 3 months ago - 12 years 3 months ago #13095
by Shargrol
Replied by Shargrol on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
Ah, got it.
Ultimately, he's doubling down on writing about it. I don't think he regrets writing about it, not really. He just wants to minimize the misinterpretations, if possible, although it is never completely possible.
There pretty much has to be a confession, like david chadwick who will often quote, about himself:
"Years of expensive Zen training gone to waste" - Zentatsu Richard Baker Roshi
But when someone takes this joke too literally and suggested he was the "zen failure" he joked about being, he says, "~I got what I was looking for in Japan."
Ultimately, he's doubling down on writing about it. I don't think he regrets writing about it, not really. He just wants to minimize the misinterpretations, if possible, although it is never completely possible.
There pretty much has to be a confession, like david chadwick who will often quote, about himself:
"Years of expensive Zen training gone to waste" - Zentatsu Richard Baker Roshi
But when someone takes this joke too literally and suggested he was the "zen failure" he joked about being, he says, "~I got what I was looking for in Japan."
Last edit: 12 years 3 months ago by Shargrol.
12 years 3 months ago #13107
by Shargrol
Replied by Shargrol on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
p.s. I'm not trying to be contrary... it's just that Brad's modus operandi is to protest too much and then go straight ahead into it. Sometimes it's contrived and too cute, sometimes it's like this excerpt where he articulates the limitations of talking about this stuff, but it's usually an "I'm an idiot and don't know anything... and here is something that isn't idiotic and something I know about."
Less
More
- Posts: 204
12 years 3 months ago #13149
by duane_eugene_miller
This nearly induces hysterical laughter (knowing you, and knowing me)
That's dawned on me repeatedly over the last 6 years of having children. I'm like "Wait... I'm the grown up now?! ... crap."
Replied by duane_eugene_miller on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
jake wrote: "oh my god, do you realize, Jake, that *you* are the adult in your life? You are the one who is in charge of all this adult business?
This nearly induces hysterical laughter (knowing you, and knowing me)
That's dawned on me repeatedly over the last 6 years of having children. I'm like "Wait... I'm the grown up now?! ... crap."
Less
More
- Posts: 718
12 years 3 months ago #13152
by Jake St. Onge
Replied by Jake St. Onge on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
lol right? total mind-bender
Less
More
- Posts: 204
12 years 3 months ago #13153
by duane_eugene_miller
I can't wait to be mysterious and annoying about this stuff. I'm already practicing for that:) My current favorite response to "spiritual" questions from peers is "Hmph." nod and smile.
Replied by duane_eugene_miller on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
Kate Gowen wrote: "It's so cute! Soon we'll all be patient old codgers being mysterious and annoying to the young bucks with their grand ideas..."
-- and one of the most annoying things about us will be how our being annoying ( in spite of a patient intention to be useful) is so damned funny-- to us. And how sweet we think the young bucks with their grand ideas are.
I can't wait to be mysterious and annoying about this stuff. I'm already practicing for that:) My current favorite response to "spiritual" questions from peers is "Hmph." nod and smile.

- Kate Gowen
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 2340
12 years 2 months ago - 12 years 2 months ago #13522
by Kate Gowen
Replied by Kate Gowen on topic Brad Warner-- "enlightenment porn"
After having many internal rants about Brad's new book, There Is No God and He Is Always With You-- the title was enough to have had me grinding my few remaining teeth-- I broke down and got a copy and have been working my cranky way through it. With many breaks to pace and rant.
Finally hit pay dirt when he got into some good stuff on Dogen, and admitted why he was taking such a provocative approach. I was not surprised that he was willing to offend both the atheists and the Buddhists who are unwilling to prioritize a shared background in the "religions of the Book"-- we know he likes to be a bad boy. I was a bit surprised to see that the real targets are "updated-for-the-21st-Century" Buddhists and the way they've vulgarized and co-opted the Buddhadharma he's put nearly 30 years into studying and practicing. I'm pretty sympathetic to that critique, myself.
"Zen Buddhists often don't like the word God. But they do like the word satori (and its cousins, kensho and enlightenment). But to me, the word satori is as problematic as the word God. No one knows quite what satori is. But those who use the word have a lot of vague ideas about it. For all the imagery they surround the word satori with, they might as well be talking about a giant white man on a throne in the sky who rules the universe.
On the other hand, God is a loaded word-- and that's precisely why it's so useful. I know it's a stretch to think of the Buddhist idea of enlightenment in terms of the Christian concept of seeing God. But we need to get a handle on what we're talking about here before going on.
To get a grip on what Buddhism is actually about we need a word that's bigger than enlightenment, that's bigger than satori. We need a word that evokes something more than a method of reducing stress, like everybody's new favorite word, mindfulness. We need a word that points to something grander than the kind of "essential secret of the universe: that you can get in a few minutes, even if you're only mildly interested.
God demands a lot more of you than that. He hasn't got time to hang out with someone who only wants to see him so that he can tell his friends he met somebody famous. The paparazzi can't get a photo of God going out to buy kitty litter and showing a bit of cellulite on his legs. He's a lot more difficult to reach than that. You've really got to want to see him, and you've got to be willing to put in the effort it's going to take.
In other words, seeing God is anything but quick and easy."
I may think that Brad has got a bit of unfamiliarity, "grass is always greener" going on in this comparative analysis-- but I respect the fundamental premise.
On beyond that part of the book, he got into the abidharma a bit-- reminding me just what I find wanting in our idea of what "psychology" is, and that I'm overdue to really plunging into the book that Steven Tainer recommended as an intro.
Finally hit pay dirt when he got into some good stuff on Dogen, and admitted why he was taking such a provocative approach. I was not surprised that he was willing to offend both the atheists and the Buddhists who are unwilling to prioritize a shared background in the "religions of the Book"-- we know he likes to be a bad boy. I was a bit surprised to see that the real targets are "updated-for-the-21st-Century" Buddhists and the way they've vulgarized and co-opted the Buddhadharma he's put nearly 30 years into studying and practicing. I'm pretty sympathetic to that critique, myself.
"Zen Buddhists often don't like the word God. But they do like the word satori (and its cousins, kensho and enlightenment). But to me, the word satori is as problematic as the word God. No one knows quite what satori is. But those who use the word have a lot of vague ideas about it. For all the imagery they surround the word satori with, they might as well be talking about a giant white man on a throne in the sky who rules the universe.
On the other hand, God is a loaded word-- and that's precisely why it's so useful. I know it's a stretch to think of the Buddhist idea of enlightenment in terms of the Christian concept of seeing God. But we need to get a handle on what we're talking about here before going on.
To get a grip on what Buddhism is actually about we need a word that's bigger than enlightenment, that's bigger than satori. We need a word that evokes something more than a method of reducing stress, like everybody's new favorite word, mindfulness. We need a word that points to something grander than the kind of "essential secret of the universe: that you can get in a few minutes, even if you're only mildly interested.
God demands a lot more of you than that. He hasn't got time to hang out with someone who only wants to see him so that he can tell his friends he met somebody famous. The paparazzi can't get a photo of God going out to buy kitty litter and showing a bit of cellulite on his legs. He's a lot more difficult to reach than that. You've really got to want to see him, and you've got to be willing to put in the effort it's going to take.
In other words, seeing God is anything but quick and easy."
I may think that Brad has got a bit of unfamiliarity, "grass is always greener" going on in this comparative analysis-- but I respect the fundamental premise.
On beyond that part of the book, he got into the abidharma a bit-- reminding me just what I find wanting in our idea of what "psychology" is, and that I'm overdue to really plunging into the book that Steven Tainer recommended as an intro.
Last edit: 12 years 2 months ago by Kate Gowen. Reason: typo